It seems from this debate that you could put together into an amendment the appeal mechanisms suggested by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, the general thrust of the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Warner, and the three examples the Minister gave of what would trigger the investigation. The Minister clearly has “resist” on every briefing for every amendment. However, this is the House of Lords and basically, we are either going to put an amendment through ourselves, which will win on Report, or the Minister will sit down with us to try to agree something. If the Minister is not able to give way on anything, frankly, it is pretty hopeless and departs from what your Lordships’ House is about. That is what I find frustrating. It is quite clear that there is a broad consensus that we need to see a trigger mechanism of some sort in the Bill. We would like to work with the Government, otherwise we are left with no option but to construct something ourselves.
Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c160GC Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:12:01 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-25/17012560000067
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-25/17012560000067
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-25/17012560000067