I understand that. There is a perfectly good argument for the benefits that are derived from incremental innovation. Not every innovation is a step change compared to what has gone before, so that is a perfectly valid point. One objective that we should arrive at, as I hope my own Amendment 10 will later reflect, is that the structure of value has to understand what those benefits might look like. New medicines will come through that are similar but are significantly better, for example in terms of compliance for patient populations, because they are administered differently. One might say, “Well, it’s a very similar drug”, but one has to look at what the overall benefit might be, which is part of the value.
Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lansley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 January 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c42GC Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:12:03 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/1701242000051
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/1701242000051
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/1701242000051