My Lords, I have great sympathy with what the noble Lord, Lord Liddle, has just said. On the lead amendment, Amendment 282, which seeks to make such an order subject to the affirmative resolution procedure, I revert to a point that I made a few moments ago. As I read it, the order-making power in subsection (5) would presumably be subject to being prayed against. I would have thought that if any authorisation was revoked, it would be likely to be highly controversial and therefore might well trigger the order being prayed against. However, that would create the same situation, because the revocation would be by the OfS but the defence would have to be by the Minister, who would be somewhat detached from the whole exercise. I am not sure how that is addressed, and I look forward to my noble friend’s comments.
Higher Education and Research Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 January 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c539 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-01-26 10:25:16 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/17012327000130
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/17012327000130
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-23/17012327000130