My Lords, I am happy to support the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, on this amendment. It is only the OfS that will do these things when they need doing and keep an eye on them, and it ought to be part of what it is meant to do. It is far too easy for schools, colleges and universities to continue with their current practices and to grouse about what is happening. However, no individual or small collection of individuals ever has sufficient incentive to kick against the current system and to try to get a motion for change going. An example of that is post-qualification admission. I speak to a lot of schools, and a large number of them would like to move to post-qualification admission. Nothing will happen unless the OfS or a similar body decides to take a look at it. I hope that my noble friend can reassure me that, should the OfS or the Government wish to take a look at these things, they can do so without any powers beyond those provided in the Bill.
Higher Education and Research Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lucas
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 January 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c306 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-01-24 15:58:36 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-18/17011898000159
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-18/17011898000159
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-18/17011898000159