It may be clearer if I make one final point. My understanding is that the underlying law on agent liability is left undisturbed, so no precedent is being set here for other areas of law which concern agent-client relationships. I recall that being a concern expressed by the noble Lord, so perhaps my making that clear to the House will help him in agreeing to withdraw the amendment.
Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c2037 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-15 14:51:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000161
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000161
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000161