I thank those noble Lords who contributed this short debate. It is right that we recognise that there are particularities in relation to in-house lawyers and I take the point made by the Minister that the exemption would be particularly useful for them. It does not get round the fact that this could easily be the thin end of the wedge. While that should not detract from the specifics of what we are discussing today, it would be odd if a very small part of a very small part of the law—while I in no sense diminish the contribution made by this Bill to the greater good—was to be adapted to allow this exemption, which then spread.
Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c2037 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-15 14:51:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000160
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000160
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-23/16112383000160