My Lords, in some cases, such as Amendment 5, what is proposed seems to be a logical amendment to the original Bill. However, in others, such as Amendments 6 and 7, the wording is identical to that used in the 2014 Act. As those proposals already exist in statute, they would unnecessarily duplicate existing legislation. Overall, the Government believe that the definitions in existing legislation are effective and fulfil the regulatory aims the Government believe are necessary. As such, the definitions of “lobbying” and “lobbyists” do not need to be changed, as proposed in the original Bill or this group of amendments.
Lobbying (Transparency) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Lobbying (Transparency) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c1708 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-07-05 16:23:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-18/16111852000067
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-18/16111852000067
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-18/16111852000067