UK Parliament / Open data

Investigatory Powers Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers Bill.

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister, who has in part repeated what he said the last time we considered these issues. I raise again my

concern that this public consultation is not, as he describes it, a serious consultation. I explained last time that Cabinet Office guidelines—I appreciate there are no rules, laws or regulations about it—say that consultations should be for 12 weeks; this consultation is for 10 weeks. Consultations should not run over a holiday period; this consultation includes Christmas and new year. Why does it not follow Cabinet Office guidelines?

I do not share the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Myners. Like the noble Baroness, Lady Hollins, I emphasise that the majority in this House voted for her original amendment, and I am sure it will not be long before this House has another opportunity to vote to force the Government to implement the provisions of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 that protect innocent victims from unreasonable and unnecessary press intrusion. The Government should know that we on these Benches will support such a vote.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

776 cc1433-4 

Session

2016-17

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top