Before my noble friend sits down, there is an important point. Is he saying that once the House has considered what he said and reflected on it, he would not oppose Amendment 66, which would leave out Clause 32, while on the other hand he would wish to keep the innovation clauses? That would, as he has said, leave all the innovation coming up from the professions and from local authorities, and remove the suspicion that the state might impose something.
Children and Social Work Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord True
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Children and Social Work Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c1074 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-08-21 13:46:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-08/16110854000020
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-08/16110854000020
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-08/16110854000020