My Lords, although I have sympathy for everything that has been said in this debate, I support those noble Lords who oppose Amendment 194. We need to consider the position of a police officer who has to deal with an exceptionally violent situation. If this amendment were agreed, the police officer would have to get much closer to someone who is extremely violent. We have technology that we can use and strict controls on how it is used, and we should not deny the police the ability to use Tasers in these circumstances.
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Attlee
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c701 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-26 12:04:50 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110252000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110252000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110252000017