My Lords, I rise briefly and with some trepidation to give a word of warning about Amendment 35. Having previously chaired corporate parent panels and attended foster carer forums, which included listening to the views of looked-after children, I am aware that we need to remember that at end of these checks—I am going to speak particularly about physical health checks—there is a child. In the past, looked-after children were often pulled out of class for a medical check-up with a GROUP—which, of course, their peers sitting around the classroom did not have to do because they had parents who would monitor their health. So, while it is really important that we collect the data, ready for report, the assessments for looked-after children have to be made extremely sensitively so that they are not stigmatised as they have been in the past.
Children and Social Work Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Children and Social Work Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
774 c2319 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-16 09:45:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-18/16101869000020
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-18/16101869000020
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-18/16101869000020