My Lords, I very much welcome the fact that the Minister has taken on board the need for consultation with employees as well as with the passengers we referred to earlier. However, as the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, has just pointed out, the Bill is uneven from one part of it to another, and something taken for granted in one section is neglected in another. As I said in an earlier debate, it is as if the Bill had been written by several different people who had not got together to make sure that the same terminology was used from one part to another. We in our party—not a party run by the trade unions; far from it—believe in the trade unions. They are an important part of a stable industrial relations picture and it is important that they are referred to, where appropriate, in the Bill.
Bus Services Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Randerson
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Bus Services Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
774 c1922 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-16 09:07:10 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-12/16101274000007
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-12/16101274000007
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-12/16101274000007