UK Parliament / Open data

Investigatory Powers Bill

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers Bill.

My Lords, I trust I can deal with this amendment with a degree of brevity equal to that employed by the noble Baroness. I reassure her that the amendment is not necessary. It is already the case that a person on whom a monetary penalty notice has been served who requests an oral hearing before the commissioner can be legally represented at the hearing. There is nothing in the Bill that would preclude such representation, and of course it will be up to the person on whom the notice is served to choose whether or not they wish to be so represented. Therefore, what is intended by the amendment is already provided for. Accordingly, I hope the noble Baroness will feel comfortable in withdrawing the amendment.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

774 c1801 

Session

2016-17

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top