My Lords, I trust I can deal with this amendment with a degree of brevity equal to that employed by the noble Baroness. I reassure her that the amendment is not necessary. It is already the case that a person on whom a monetary penalty notice has been served who requests an oral hearing before the commissioner can be legally represented at the hearing. There is nothing in the Bill that would preclude such representation, and of course it will be up to the person on whom the notice is served to choose whether or not they wish to be so represented. Therefore, what is intended by the amendment is already provided for. Accordingly, I hope the noble Baroness will feel comfortable in withdrawing the amendment.
Investigatory Powers Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
774 c1801 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-16 09:05:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-11/161011127000123
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-11/161011127000123
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-11/161011127000123