It is not so much the dissemination of the Law Commission’s work but the question of where the individual reports have got to. It is not that nobody knows it is happening—its electoral law report is excellent—but it needs to be followed through, and if it is not, we need to be told why. Frankly, asking about this was a way to put pressure on the Government to make sure that this very good work is not dissipated. I understand that what the commission does may not always be acceptable—that is fine—but let us make sure that we either bring it forward and use it or kill it off and say that we do not want it. That is why I hope that the Minister will be able to tell us—not now; I quite understood that she could not do that, but perhaps she could write to those of us who have interests in this—the situation with regard to the tremendous work that the Law Commission has been doing on individual projects, not just this one.
Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 June 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Second Reading Committee proceeding on Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
773 c22GC Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-16 14:51:15 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-15/16061543000021
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-15/16061543000021
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-15/16061543000021