I am grateful to my noble friend. I think the argument is stronger than he put in relation to financial privilege being claimed, because that has happened twice. The second time, which was last Wednesday, the noble Lord, Lord Kerslake, believed that the amendment would not invoke financial privilege, but it did. In that sense, the House has perhaps inadvertently sent an amendment back in lieu once, in contradiction of the financial privilege argument. To do so twice seems a serious breach of the convention.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lansley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 May 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
771 c1693 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-21 09:50:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051043000014
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051043000014
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051043000014