My Lords, as I indicated, I have taken on board the comments made in the previous debate and revised my amendment significantly. In particular—and this is the crucial point—it does not seek to impose a requirement on the Secretary of State as regards social rented housing. It is clear beyond doubt, as perhaps the previous amendment was not, that this is a matter that the Secretary of State is asked to consider, but does not necessarily have to agree. It is therefore a choice for the Secretary of State and as such would not have financial implications. Secondly, the first leg of my amendment simply seeks to say that if you reach an agreement, it has to be funded. That is all it says.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kerslake
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 May 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
771 c1688 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-21 09:50:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051041000064
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051041000064
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-05-10/16051041000064