UK Parliament / Open data

Immigration Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 May 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Immigration Bill.

My Lords, I am obliged to noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. I acknowledge the work done in the past by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, on detention and on the revising of the immigration and detention rules. I must, however, take issue with the suggestion that access to bail is merely theoretical and that there is an absence of judicial oversight.

The access to bail arises immediately on detention and a tribunal must be persuaded that there are substantial grounds for believing that detention should be maintained. This is not a theoretical right; it is an obligation on the part of the Home Office to persuade a tribunal that detention should be maintained. So far as the period of detention is concerned, I can confirm to the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, that, after a period extending to four months—which is highly unusual—there will be an automatic bail hearing. In these circumstances, I renew my Motion to the House.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

771 c1661 

Session

2015-16

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Subjects

Back to top