My Lords, Amendment 95B in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Beecham proposes to leave out the words “as an alternative” and add “in addition” to the list of the breaches in Schedule 9 to the Bill. Our reason for tabling this amendment is that the offences here do not justify being downgraded, and if left unamended the effect of the schedule would be just that: they would be downgraded. It would be helpful for me in deciding whether I should divide the House if the noble Viscount could explain very clearly why he believes that these offences should be downgraded and left to a fine by the local authority. I cannot see how that will benefit anyone, or that leaving the courts out of this process would be a good thing. I beg to move.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kennedy of Southwark
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 April 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
771 c533 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-20 10:26:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-18/16041823000070
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-18/16041823000070
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-18/16041823000070