The noble Baroness has said that there will be time to see how the matter develops. I remind her that Amendment 69A, in my name and that of my noble friend, would allow for that because it is a sunset clause. It would allow a three-year period to see how the process worked. If it did work, it could be renewed by the affirmative procedure, which, as we know, should not take all that long. Why do the Government not accept that amendment and give some reassurance that they will not press ahead with this irrespective of the outcome? The amendment would allow them to affirm the policy, assuming they are still in office, after a three-year period and on the basis of experience. Is that not a more pragmatic way of dealing with a difficult issue?
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 March 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c1600 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-13 14:51:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-14/1603149000151
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-14/1603149000151
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-14/1603149000151