My Lords, I was interested to see this amendment, and I understand what the noble Lord is proposing and have some sympathy with what he says. There was one interesting aspect which caught my eye when I read it. I was not sure whether it was deliberate, but the noble Lord has left in place that although the commissioner will be appointed by Letters Patent, the Secretary of State will appoint one or more deputies to act for him, even though the commissioner appoints the rest of the staff. Is it the intention to leave a deputy commissioner—of one or more deputy commissioners within the commissioner’s office—as the representative of the Secretary of State, which is what one would assume from their appointment if all the rest of the staff are appointed by the commissioner? If the amendment were carried, would the noble Lord seek to refine those proposals?
Enterprise Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Cope of Berkeley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 October 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Enterprise Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c109GC Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:23:45 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102615000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102615000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102615000017