Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

My Lords, I, too, am a member of the Joint Committee on Human Rights and wish to speak to Clause ...

My Lords, a few weeks ago I was quite taken aback when I received from a Conservative Peer a mess...

My Lords, I support my noble friends Lord Faulks and Lady Berridge, although I am not on the Join...

My Lords, Clause 91 is headed “Offences connected with riot” and presumably the intention is agai...

With regard to the question that the noble Lord asked me before our tea break, I have nothing fur...

I understand what the Minister is saying, but he seems reluctant to admit that under this Bill so...

An owner-occupier with a mortgage might well find his home taken from him as a result of a term o...

I am very grateful to the Minister for giving way. He has been asked this question a number of ti...

I am grateful to my noble friend for his intervention, which points to a difference. There is a d...

I am always interested to listen to a lawyer explaining the law. However, that point does not ans...

The noble Lord has made that point several times. It is up to other noble Lords to judge whether ...

My Lords, I confess that I am a little confused by the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Rosser. A...

I said that no redress of comparable severity would apply to an owner-occupier as opposed to some...

As I said, the noble Lord is concerned about differentiation. That is where my logic—perhaps not ...

Moved by

Baroness Hamwee

56F: Clause 93, page 64, line 14, leave out “one” and insert...

My Lords, in moving Amendment 56F, I will speak also to Amendments 56G and 56H, as well as Amendm...

My Lords, I shall be brief. I shall certainly be interested to hear the Minister’s response to th...

My Lords, perhaps I may deal with that point. It is clear that local authorities are likely to be...

My Lords, how will the remedies be evaluated? I am inclined to think that the community remedy is...

Each PCC has to consult within his area on what is considered to be an appropriate menu—if one mi...

My Lords, I suspect that the debate about the role of the local authority and the relationships b...

Moved by

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

56J: Clause 94, page 66, line 10, at end insert—<...

My Lords, this is a probing amendment, which seeks to put in place a scrutiny element in decision...

My Lords, one of the issues that my noble friend Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede raised is the apparen...

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, for tabling his amendment. As he explained, it i...

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Ahmad, for that response to my amendment. I am pleased tha...

On that point, as I said in my response, one thing that the wider review is doing is talking dire...

Once again, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Ahmad, for that explanation. I will make one last point....

Moved by

Baroness Smith of Basildon

56K: Clause 96, page 67, line 30, at end insert—<...

This amendment is regarding the threshold for review for the community trigger. We are concerned ...

My Lords, the noble Baroness has made some interesting and important points and I agree that the ...

I come to this area of problems between neighbours or people in residential environments through ...

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 56K. For far too long we have allowed concerns about the rig...

My Lords, this has been a good debate and we have addressed the whole relevance of the community ...

The noble Lord said page 58; did he mean page 68?

I apologise if I misdirected the Committee. There is direct reference to the subjective nature of...

I am grateful to the Minister; I think he has heard what I said. I should like to read the detail...