My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Brennan in his attempt to remove subsection (2)(b) from Clause 124. As he has clearly told the House, it would enable secondary legislation to amend future Acts prior to the end of the Session—not this Act, but other enactments. This is an extraordinary power which was justified in Committee by using the argument that there are precedents. No precedents have been produced. It is shocking that the promise of a letter made over five weeks ago has not actually been kept on something which raised considerable concern in Committee. I think that the Government need to take this matter very seriously indeed and not palm it off with what seem to be entirely unsubstantiated stories of precedence.
Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Eatwell
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 27 November 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
749 c1480 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-12-20 05:24:42 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112763000124
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112763000124
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112763000124