UK Parliament / Open data

Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Eatwell (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 27 November 2013. It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill.

My Lords, Amendment 172 derives from, and is a response to, an amendment that the Government successfully moved in Committee, which

gave the PRA a secondary competition objective directly related to issues of market structure and performance. We have developed in this Bill, and in the previous Financial Services Bill which we also considered in this Session, a twin-peaks approach to financial regulation, with the Financial Conduct Authority looking at conduct of business and the Prudential Regulation Authority looking at issues associated with the prudential behaviour of firms.

Given that the PRA now has a competition objective, we should not allow the twin peaks to isolate consumer representation. The FCA consumer panel has an important role in advising on and responding to FCA proposals with respect to conduct of business but, with the PRA now having a competition objective, the issues which affect consumers directly will involve the competition element of prudential regulation. It is important, and entirely appropriate, that the PRA at least consider and respond to representations made by the FCA’s Consumer Panel—that is all we are asking for—so that decisions which the PRA makes with respect to market structure and performance have an appropriate consumer input. I beg to move.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

749 cc1451-2 

Session

2013-14

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top