My Lords, I add my support to what the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, said in specifying these particular contracts, not only for their tax avoidance capacity but because participation in them within the trading community leads to obvious conflicts of interest between their main work during the day, for their employer, and any potential gains or losses they have through the spread betting operations which they are capable of undertaking. In other words, it is very much a cultural problem and it is specifically to do with contracts that are considered to come under the purview of the gaming Acts. That is how I understood this amendment to apply, rather than more generally. From my point of view, I am not certain that it needs to be in the Bill, but it would certainly be useful if the Government were to say that the scope and impact of this should be looked at.
Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Archbishop of Canterbury
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 27 November 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
749 c1438 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-07 15:51:33 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112754000121
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112754000121
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-27/13112754000121