My Lords, I will add a brief word to what has just been said in support of Amendment 20. The words “any person” at the end of Clause 1(2) are rather important; I would have thought that they make it all the more important that the words which the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, has suggested are put in. Without that, one would have the very difficult task as a judge of having to assess the evidence of one individual and deciding whether that individual is to be believed. If that individual says that he or she has been annoyed or suffered a nuisance, it would be quite difficult to say that the test was not satisfied. The reasonableness test is the one which would soften this and make it more realistic, and I would have thought that it was compatible with the general aim of the measure.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hope of Craighead
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 November 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
749 c787 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-12-20 05:08:46 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-18/13111831000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-18/13111831000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-11-18/13111831000017