My Lords, I remember discussing this at length during the passage of the previous Financial Services Bill. At that time, I commented that one could often detect whether a proposition made any sense by proposing a negative outcome. If we suppose that the duty is to make the markets work badly, that does not make any sense at all. Therefore, it seems to me that the strategic objective is entirely redundant and serves no useful purpose. Indeed, the idea of changing what were previously operational objectives into prime objectives places competition at that prime level and achieves the objectives which the Government themselves have argued are necessary. For some reason, this issue was never satisfactorily explained previously and has not been satisfactorily explained now. We should apply Occam’s razor and take it out.
Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Eatwell
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 October 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
748 c508 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-12-20 04:30:46 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-15/1310167000036
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-15/1310167000036
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-15/1310167000036