My Lords, I have enormous sympathy with the amendments and the struggle that the Treasury is having in having effectively to provide rules for parent undertakings in relation to the maintenance of the ring-fence. In many ways, the amendments go at least some of the way to achieving that. However, I should like to ask a question which I asked at Second Reading and which was not answered then. The Minister referred to capital and debt being raised at the level of the parent company and then downstreamed into the ring-fenced entity. If it can be downstreamed, can it not be upstreamed? If that were so, the ring-fence would not exist.
Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Eatwell
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 October 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL), Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
748 c36 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-12-20 04:24:44 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-08/13100819000178
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-08/13100819000178
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-10-08/13100819000178