Before the Minister sits down, when she says that the companies are “not obliged”, I find it difficult to understand her choice of language. It is as if we are asking them to do something difficult. At best, we could say that we will just aim at the top six, or top seven if we included First Utility. The other side of this is that, such is the stickiness in this market, most people do not switch, so that 60%-odd are receiving their bills from the same company year after year. We have been far too easy on these companies, and the Minister gives me no comfort whatever by using phrases such as “not obliged”. We should dashed well make them do it; we have the powers to do so. The regulator can do these things. It might be uncomfortable for the regulator but the consumer is entitled to know. I hope that she goes away and reflects on whether or not we should make the obligation rather more forceful than it currently is.
Energy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan
(Non-affiliated)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 July 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
747 c80GC Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:33:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-09/1307101000218
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-09/1307101000218
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-09/1307101000218