My Lords, before my noble friend replies, having been asked direct questions, perhaps I may reply briefly. I envisage that there would be a wide range of special reasons. As the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, suggested, they would include a history of breach of previous supervision requirements. However they might also encompass areas of special risk to do with the particular offender. The shortcoming of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 at which this amendment is aimed is that under Section 152 only the seriousness of the offences is taken into account. There may well be reasons to do with the offender that could justify a custodial sentence, but the point of the amendment is to make it quite clear that in the absence of such special reasons, whether they are to do with history, special risk or other reasons, the presumption in favour of a community sentence should apply.
Offender Rehabilitation Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 June 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Offender Rehabilitation Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c1530 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-29 09:27:53 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061174000132
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061174000132
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061174000132