I am sorry to interrupt again. I think the noble Earl said that we should leave it to the local providers’ decisions as to what or how much CPD individuals should have. We know, however, that at the moment local providers are very variable in how far they are willing to go along that route. The problem is that leaving it where it is certainly does not give any great confidence that CPD will be uniformly available in the service. Hence the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Patel, which tries to give a little force and pressure to local providers so that they could indeed be sure that CPD was being provided. The noble Earl is full of good intentions, quite rightly, but we need a little more than that.
Care Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Turnberg
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 June 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Care Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c1491 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-29 09:19:36 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061047000053
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061047000053
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061047000053