My Lords, I do not think that anybody is suggesting that we should stretch the scheme in the Bill to encompass other arrangements. Certainly, however, Amendment 46 would require a commitment from the Government that they will bring before Parliament within a period of time other arrangements to deal with these other situations. It is accepted that it cannot be readily grafted on to the existing diffuse mesothelioma scheme for the reasons that the Minister has advanced. We are looking for the commitment to saying, “Let us move on and bring forward a scheme or schemes to deal with these other issues”.
Mesothelioma Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Mesothelioma Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c313GC Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:29:26 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061044000096
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061044000096
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-10/13061044000096