I am pretty settled with that last sentence. We have been a place of safety for about 80,000 from Ukraine; we have opened our arms to some 250,000 British nationals of Hong Kong descent; we have had the Syria programme, which I believe involved about 20,000; and we have had the Afghan resettlement programme, which involved about 18,000 to 20,000. All those have been safe and legal routes. The big difference is that the British Government, representing the British people, decided that those were the people we wanted to help. They were the most vulnerable, and we took the decision, not criminal gangs from abroad.
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Jerome Mayhew
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 January 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
743 c926 Session
2023-24Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-12 17:22:03 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-17/240117138000011
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-17/240117138000011
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-17/240117138000011