I fundamentally agree with that proposition. Lots of brownfield sites offer spectacular views—whether of a skyline or out towards the countryside. The big challenge is political ambition, but we also need recognition within the tax system through the infrastructure levy to ensure that prospective developers do not look at a brownfield site and a comparator in the green belt or open countryside and say, “It is far cheaper for us to develop the countryside.” If we had a sliding scale to make it cost-neutral to the developer, so that they paid far less in the infrastructure levy or another form of taxation to develop a brownfield site, that would be a quick political win to get us to the brownfield development that I think all right hon. and hon. Members who have spoken in the debate want to see.
Brownfield Development and Green Belt
Proceeding contribution from
Greg Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 February 2023.
It occurred during Backbench debate
and
e-petition debate on Brownfield Development and Green Belt.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c386WH Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-13 14:41:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-02-09/23020953000083
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-02-09/23020953000083
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-02-09/23020953000083