I simply do not accept that point. Although it is true that life-and-limb measures exist, we have seen through the many months of rail closures and the strikes that took place last week and in December that unfortunately minimum service levels in one case, and actually minimum safety levels in another, have simply not been available. I know that Opposition Members do not want to accept this fundamental point, but their constituents’ lives are being put at risk by the NHS’s inability to put the correct cover in place with sufficient notice. They seem to imagine that the Army will just be there at no notice and with no ability to organise which areas of the country it needs to be in. That, I am afraid, is not a practical way to run the—[Interruption.]
Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Grant Shapps
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 16 January 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c59 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-01-17 16:42:51 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-01-16/23011645000050
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-01-16/23011645000050
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-01-16/23011645000050