The hon. Gentleman is making an interesting argument about why the new clause is too wide. Is there not also the problem that it risks investments themselves due to a chilling effect for investors who might not withdraw from an investment when it is economically advisable to do so because of fear of breaking the rules under the new clause, so we could end up with the devaluation of pension schemes?
Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Lloyd Russell-Moyle
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 February 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c217Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-07-19 15:34:58 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000017