The hon. Member is absolutely right. If the new clause was intended purely to limit the activities of the BDS movement as a precursor to possible further restrictions later on, a very different new clause would have been tabled, and it might have been possible to word it in a way that we would not have significant problems with, but this new clause is far too wide. It could give the Secretary of State—any Secretary of State—the power to prevent any public pension fund from considering any kind of ethical, sustainability or other factors simply because they decide that they are contrary to UK foreign or defence policy.
Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Grant
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 February 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c217 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-07-19 15:34:56 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000016
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000016
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-02-22/22022244000016