I entirely support what the Minister says about judicial pensions reform, but, since he wears another hat in his capacity as Chief Secretary to the Treasury, may I raise a further issue that is sometimes an impediment to recruitment, namely the operation of the lifetime cap on pensions earnings? In particular, many who have earned well at the Bar and who might otherwise seek appointment to the High Court bench still encounter a disincentive because of the operation of the overall lifetime cap. At one point a carve-out was arranged to reflect that. Although this does not feature in the Bill, may I ask the Minister to take it away and perhaps speak to the Chancellor about it? It is the final bit of the jigsaw that could be sensibly introduced to encourage the very best people to seek appointment to the bench.
Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 January 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c87 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-01-06 13:04:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-05/22010570000052
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-05/22010570000052
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-05/22010570000052