Perhaps the Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor could help me on two matters. When these matters of suspended quashing orders are being worked out, will he ensure that no litigant who has succeeded and has suffered tangible loss is left without an effective remedy? That will be important, outwith any other considerations that might very properly be taken into account. I also gently say to him that he has clearly been absent from justice debates for a little while—and we welcome him back—or he would surely have known that my hon. Friend the Member for Stone (Sir William Cash) never misses an opportunity to raise Factortame when we talk about topics of this kind; he has managed to do so in this debate as well.
Judicial Review and Courts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 October 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Judicial Review and Courts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c192 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-27 11:53:05 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-26/21102641000113
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-26/21102641000113
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-26/21102641000113