Yes, I do agree. In fact, some of those 60,000 are people whose asylum claims are not pending but whose asylum claims have been rejected, and where the legal process has been convoluted and removal has not been effected. One of the things that we intend to do in our Bill is ensure that failed asylum seekers can be more quickly returned to their safe country of origin, which, of course, is what should happen. My hon. Friend is right that we need to speed up asylum decision making and get these numbers down. That is fair to individuals who have a valid asylum claim, but also to the taxpayer, upon whom otherwise falls an extremely large financial burden. I agree entirely with my hon. Friend’s sentiments.
Immigration Rules: Supported Accommodation
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Philp
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 December 2020.
It occurred during Urgent question on Immigration Rules: Supported Accommodation.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c290 Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-30 01:19:45 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-12-16/20121610000013
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-12-16/20121610000013
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-12-16/20121610000013