On a point of order, Mr Speaker. I entirely follow the logic of your argument, but what weight did you give to the fact that when we were debating on Saturday, nobody knew whether the Prime Minister would send a letter, and since that has happened, although you are quite correct, Sir, to say that the motion that is the same, an event outside has dramatically changed it? Given that the motion on Saturday was clear that final approval cannot be given until the deal has gone through in legislation, would it not be, as you have always said, for the House to decide on this matter, notwithstanding the fact that the previous motion is clear about what is going to happen? That would give the country the opportunity to know whether the House approves or disapproves of the Prime Minister’s deal.
Speaker’s Statement
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Bone
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 21 October 2019.
It occurred during Speaker's statement on Speaker’s Statement.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
666 c696 Session
2019-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-20 11:40:03 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-21/1910215000193
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-21/1910215000193
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-21/1910215000193