The point I was making was not that there was necessarily a lack of consultation, but that we did not know how much consultation there had been, because the details are not in the explanatory notes, where they would often be. Normally, the explanatory notes will say a bit about the amount of consultation there has been, but they do not say anything at all. If that had been written down for us, and we had known how many consultation responses there had been, I would not have asked the question.
National Insurance Contributions (Termination Awards and Sporting Testimonials) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Kirsty Blackman
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 30 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions (Termination Awards and Sporting Testimonials) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
659 c172 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-05-14 12:24:04 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-30/19043017000166
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-30/19043017000166
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-30/19043017000166