I thought it might be productive to intervene on my hon. Friend�s remarks, with literally all of which I disagree profoundly. On this one point, I think it might be productive because there is a fact about this that he will see if he looks at the amendment paper. The Government have tabled new clause 13, which many of us feel is a very sensible proposal and whose acceptance we therefore recommend. It specifically provides for a negative resolution statutory instrument to be substituted for an affirmative resolution SI, in order that it could be made immediately upon being deposited, rather than awaiting the approval of the House. That could obviously be subject to revision later under the negative resolution prayer procedure, but we would all have to be a gang of lunatics not to keep the exit day in line with international law if, as a matter of fact and for better or worse, the Prime Minister had agreed a given date of exit.
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Oliver Letwin
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
657 c1179 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-29 13:04:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000071
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000071
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000071