The right hon. Gentleman makes a compelling case on people�s concerns about what may happen in a Brexit without a withdrawal agreement, but the European Union has explained to us on many occasions that the withdrawal agreement is now basically a hermetically sealed box, and many of the things he discusses in relation to the future relationship, such as trading, are encompassed in the political declaration, which cannot be binding�we have been told that many times. I genuinely fail to understand why, if he is so concerned about our leaving without an agreement, he does not just vote for the withdrawal agreement and then set about making his case for what should be in the political declaration, which cannot be binding until we have formally left the European Union.
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
James Cleverly
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
657 c1169 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-29 13:01:44 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000011
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000011
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040366000011