I do not disagree at all with the Father of the House. I think a long extension would be preferable. I do not think there is anything for us to fear in terms of European elections. After all that is called democracy and at least it means more of our constituents can get involved in this process. In terms of the different elements of this Bill and the duties we are seeking to impose on the Government, it has been said that to find a way forward through all of this requires compromise. As I have said, I believe there should be a duty in this Bill for the Government to seek an extension in order to provide for a people�s vote. Why do those of us who argue for a people�s vote want a people�s vote? We do so because we want to give the British people the ability to take a different course, and in so doing there is compromise. The easy thing to do if we wanted to stop Brexit from happening would be to simply ignore the 2016 result.
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Chuka Umunna
(Independent (affiliation))
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
657 c1157 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-29 12:56:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040362000040
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040362000040
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040362000040