I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his remark that he was listening carefully to what I said. In the preceding section of what I was saying, I explained the reason for the Bill, which is to provide a transparent means of ensuring that the precise details of the extension that the Government seek are brought before the House. That would have been necessary anyway. My view is that it would be a good proceeding for our Parliament to have the opportunity to scrutinise and debate the extension proposed by the Government. I am now explaining not why it is an emergency but why it is a quick process. The reason for it being a quick process is that, if we believe it to be a necessary one, it would obviously be redundant if done after the event to which it refers.
Business of the House
Proceeding contribution from
Oliver Letwin
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on Business of the House.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
657 c1060 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-29 12:17:46 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040328000009
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040328000009
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040328000009