My hon. Friend makes a fair point that has been raised several times. Indeed, an amendment to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 has been tabled in the other place to that effect. I have some sympathy with those changes, but for me they are largely a matter of taxation and an issue for the Treasury, because they mainly concern inheritance tax and other tax matters. My Bill is a social family Bill, and one reason for it is an attempt to cement family units and create greater stability for children—recognising a partnership in law, with all the protections that goes with that, is a good fillip for family stability. The point raised by my hon. Friend is a separate and largely financial issue, and I would be sympathetic to separate legislation that will not mess up my Bill but will address that point elsewhere.
Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc.) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Tim Loughton
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 26 October 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc.) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
648 c558 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-10-29 18:24:24 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-26/18102616000221
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-26/18102616000221
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-26/18102616000221