I absolutely take that point on board. We want to ensure that individuals with sufficient expertise from organisations such as the Victoria and Albert Museum are in a position to provide a guarantee of the provenance and significance of the work. It is in no way our intention simply to say that something should be exempt either because of its apparent antiquity or because someone happens to consider it to be of aesthetic merit; we want to ensure that an academically rigorous process is undertaken to ensure that an item’s provenance can be guaranteed and that its aesthetic merit and its dating can be put beyond doubt.
Ivory Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Michael Gove
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 June 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Ivory Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
642 c98 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-04-03 16:05:33 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000062
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000062
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000062