UK Parliament / Open data

Ivory Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Mann (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 June 2018. It occurred during Debate on bills on Ivory Bill.

Would the Secretary of State accept that his commentary ought to be slightly amended, because we do not all recognise that historic ivory should be kept? Some of us think that this is an excuse for a continuation of the trade and that it creates loopholes and opportunities for those who wish to poach to masquerade their products as historic ivory. In fact, a bit like collections of shrunken heads, certain things were done by past generations, but in today’s more enlightened world, we do not need to keep those things. Some of us would rather see all ivory banned.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

642 c97 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Legislation

Ivory Bill 2017-19
Back to top