Would the Secretary of State accept that his commentary ought to be slightly amended, because we do not all recognise that historic ivory should be kept? Some of us think that this is an excuse for a continuation of the trade and that it creates loopholes and opportunities for those who wish to poach to masquerade their products as historic ivory. In fact, a bit like collections of shrunken heads, certain things were done by past generations, but in today’s more enlightened world, we do not need to keep those things. Some of us would rather see all ivory banned.
Ivory Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mann
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 June 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Ivory Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
642 c97 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-04-03 16:05:33 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000057
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000057
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000057