Among the tens of thousands of people who responded to the consultation were my constituents, Susie Laan and Louise Ravula, who are part of a small but effective organisation called Two Million Tusks, representing the million elephants slaughtered in the past 100 years. They did some original research that showed that, in 72 auction houses covering 180 lots of ivory, 90% of the sales of those lots were unable to prove the provenance—in other words, the dating to pre-1947—of the ivory, which is a legal requirement for the sale of ivory at the moment. Does my right hon. Friend agree that that research proves that we need a pretty comprehensive ban if we cannot tell the date of the product being sold?
Ivory Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Julian Lewis
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 June 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Ivory Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
642 c95 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-04-03 16:05:32 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000047
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000047
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-04/18060440000047