I understand that it is a matter of interpretation. I also understand that the Home Office is considering these matters in the fallout from the Windrush case. I am sure that, as Chair of the Home Affairs Committee, the right hon. Lady will have ample opportunity to question the new Home Secretary on exactly what he might mean by “necessary and proportionate”. When someone is seeking access to data from the Home Office to prove their immigration history, such as in the Windrush cases, there will be no basis for invoking the immigration exemption in the Bill. I trust that that provides the right hon. Lady with some comfort.
Data Protection Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Margot James
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 May 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Data Protection Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
640 c759 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-14 12:58:51 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-09/18050943000889
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-09/18050943000889
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-09/18050943000889